Re: Ftoomsh MUD?

Peter Meric (pmeric@nospam.socs.uts.EDU.AU)
Wed, 20 Apr 1994 10:27:27 +1000 (EST)

On Wed, 20 Apr 1994 raz@nospam.number5.apana.org.au wrote:

> This will become more of an issue as the intended readership of the
> list grows. For those who don't know, most mailers provide at least
> two reply options, one to reply to the author of the message and one to
> reply to all who are reading. The current configuration of progsoc@nospam....
> subverts this fairly common feature such that the user is forced
> to type out the author's address in full if (s)he wishes to send a
> private reply.

Well, Pine asks you if you'd like to reply to the "From:" address
rather than the "Reply to:" address (but defaults to the "Reply to:"
address) ie. don't have to type the author's address.

Peter

------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The integrity of some computer systems could be proportional to the
capabilities of some or all of its administrators, but probably isn't."

Peter Meric - pmeric@nospam.socs.uts.edu.au or pmeric@nospam.itd.uts.edu.au