Re: [ProgSoc] $10 for non-uts-union members

[Christian Kent <whophd@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au>]

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Justin Warren wrote:

> I seem to recall this being discussed in previous years. Wasn't there an
> issue with getting Union affiliation for ProgSoc if we don't charge
> non-union people more than union people? I vaguely recall something in
> a Union blurb somewhere, though this was many years ago.

Well, as you'd quickly find out if you read the non-existent minutes, or
if you attend the meeting (but don't let me dissuade you from voting
against me just because I'm Prez, please), this no longer applies because
the double-the-fee requirement was there because Union memberships were
getting dollar-for-dollar cash grants from the Union to the clubs, but
that only applied to club members who were union members;  non-union
members would have to cough up their own cash.  However, the cash grants
no longer exist, so the 4.1.1 requirement is now unnecessary.  Does that
make sense?  I should rewrite that but that's Matt's job.

ProgSoc only really needs $10 per member anyway, not $20.

> Has the situation changed? I hope so, 'cos it'll save me money. :)

Yep.

Matt, please post the minutes.


CK.
-- 
DISCLAIMER:  This email has been sent without the intention to offend,
unless the intention is specifically stated.  All statements stand open to
correction unless otherwise indicated.  All statements are to be taken in
a positive and affable tone where at all possible.  The sender's idea of a
practical joke does not include such things that require in excess of 15
minutes to reverse.  The recipients' leniency will be highly appreciated.

-
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to progsoc-request@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au.
If you are having trouble, ask owner-progsoc@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au for help.