Re: [ProgSoc] $10 for non-uts-union members

[Justin Warren <justin.warren@nospam.edion.com>]

On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 03:39:01PM +1100, Christian Kent wrote:
> 
> Well, as you'd quickly find out if you read the non-existent minutes, or
> if you attend the meeting (but don't let me dissuade you from voting
> against me just because I'm Prez, please), this no longer applies because
> the double-the-fee requirement was there because Union memberships were
> getting dollar-for-dollar cash grants from the Union to the clubs, but
> that only applied to club members who were union members;  non-union
> members would have to cough up their own cash.  However, the cash grants
> no longer exist, so the 4.1.1 requirement is now unnecessary.  Does that
> make sense?  I should rewrite that but that's Matt's job.
> 
> ProgSoc only really needs $10 per member anyway, not $20.

Excellent. I should really arrange a proxy so someone can vote on my 
behalf since I'm unlikely to be anywhere near Sydney at the time I would
need to be. Anyone feel like voting in favour of this thing for me?

-- 
Justin Warren - Senior Unix Consultant, Edion Pty Ltd
  justin.warren@nospam.edion.com | http://www.edion.com
"First they came for the verbs, and I said nothing because verbing weirds
 language.  Then they arrival for the nouns, and I speech nothing because
 I no verbs."                                        - Peter Ellis on afp
-
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to progsoc-request@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au.
If you are having trouble, ask owner-progsoc@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au for help.