Re: [ProgSoc] Re: [PROGSOC-ANNOUNCE] Notice of Special General Meeting (SGM)

[Telford <telford@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au>]

On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:44:57AM +1100, Christian Kent wrote:

> Cons, I open the floor to.  We may raise less cash in 2001 than 2000.

I think it would be better to raise the membership more than raise
more cash... we still have hardware that we aren't using so it seems
like we should not buy too much more until we at least TRY to get
the SS2000 going. (looks like we are going to have to spend a little
bit of money on a locksmith to make new keys so we can turn the bugger on
cos no one seems to know where the keys went... stryker? got any spares?)

> > but it would be interesting to know whether you were planning to
> > accept proxies and, if so, how?
> 
> Never crossed anyone's mind, sorry.  I had assumed that the quorum would
> be achievable, and that those feeling the urge to vote would find a friend
> to vouch for them;  inevitably we'll just go for an honour system because
> the level of controversy is epsilon, and IMO there's no call for any more
> formality than this right now.  Well, there is yours ... no wait, it's
> just a question.

Seems reasonable that people can announce proxies publically on the progsoc
list... after all voting is not secret so why should proxies be? Once announced
publically anyone can complain if they think something dodgy is going on.
If they don't complain then they must agree.

-- 
S1G: 17684329 seconds remaining			- Tel
-
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to progsoc-request@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au.
If you are having trouble, ask owner-progsoc@nospam.progsoc.uts.edu.au for help.