[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [ProgSoc] Re: [ADMIN] imap & pop



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-progsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
> progsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marcus Schappi
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2005 4:22 PM
> To: Nathan de Vries
> Cc: Robert Howard; progsoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ProgSoc] Re: [ADMIN] imap & pop
> 
> On 13/12/2005, at 2:03 PM, Nathan de Vries wrote:
> 
> 
> Name another OS where AVERAGE JOE can securely do day-day office
> tasks. (Hear being able

I'm not sure how you can claim "secure" - Mac OS X has been criticised quite
a bit lately about being the most insecure *NIX out there at the moment. In
fact, I remember distinctly some of the presenters at RUXCON 2005 giving
demonstrations of how bad Mac OS X security is, and how the *BSD variants
had made patches for these problems months earlier, but Apple strangely had
not made an effort at that point in time. 

Nigel

--
Nigel Sheridan-Smith
PhD research student

Faculty of Engineering
University of Technology, Sydney
Phone: 02 9514 7946
Fax: 02 9514 2435



-
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to progsoc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you are having trouble, ask owner-progsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for help.