[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ProgSoc] ipod battery
On 13/06/2006, at 10:14 PM, Roland Turner wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 10:57 +0000, John Elliot wrote:
I had a discussion once with a UTS staff member (I'm not sure what
their
name was, a lecturer in some IT field), because I was thinking about
leaving. Their advice was to stay, because, according to this person,
when he and his wife entertained friends who hadn't been to
university
the level of conversation was low. I.e. people who didn't go to
university were dull, and "you could tell". (This comment struck
me as
wrong, 'for so many reasons').
Confusing correlation with cause is a pretty common error, if indeed
there was a correlation in this case. Assuming that the prejudices
of a
single academic are representative of the tone of an entire
school/college/faculty, or worse an entire university, is another.
Brace yourself.
Sadly, I tend to agree with him on a university scale. I mean, take a
look at the Big Ass (tm) banner hanging from the UTS Faculty of IT
building. It says "10 Reasons for choosing UTS: ...", and then goes
on to list all the UTS faculties - such as IT, Science, Law etc. -
which are available at EVERY Australian university (and TAFE for that
matter). Think about that for a second...let's assume that there have
been ~5 or so people involved writing up that banner. There's
copywriters, designers, sign-writers etc. Each of them have seen this
sign, done their part on it, and now we see it - hanging up for all
to see.
You might be thinking to yourself, what the hell does this have to do
with anything? It's just a sign after all, right? Well in my humble
opinion, that sign and those who were involved in creating it are
very much indicative of UTS:FIT and its' staff. Or perhaps even
universities in general. The message on the sign indicates that even
the university thinks it has nothing to offer its' students other
than what all other universities and TAFEs can offer. The staff which
were involved in the sign-writing process probably saw how ridiculous
it was but didn't feel they could change anything. Even scarier,
they might NOT have seen how ridiculous it was.
It's the same in the classroom; very few lecturers and tutors bring
real world examples into the material that's been taught for decades.
Reason? Either they don't keep up to date with the field they're
teaching, they don't keep up to date at all, or they just don't see
the point. What reason do they have to migrate from the syllabus
they've been given? The university certainly doesn't encourage it,
and now we've even got students who COMPLAIN when staff stray from
the syllabus and teach relevant, real-world stuff. All they want is
their piece of paper and a job-placement in some large bullshit
conglomerate.
Yes, I'm jaded. Please excuse the rant - the production-line nature
of universities angers me.
--
Nathan
President, UTS Programmers' Society
-
You are subscribed to the progsoc mailing list. To unsubscribe, send a
message containing "unsubscribe" to progsoc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you are having trouble, ask owner-progsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for help.