From knockycode at progsoc.org Thu Oct 1 09:58:23 2015 From: knockycode at progsoc.org (Jenny Nguyen) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:58:23 +1000 Subject: [ProgSoc] ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October In-Reply-To: References: <3351a3ce39ae1b44eda9811bde4f95ed.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> Message-ID: I'll be in class from 6pm to 8pm so I wouldn't be able to join a hangout even if I wanted. So can someone have my proxy vote? On 29 September 2015 at 21:23, Robin Wohlers-Reichel < robin.wohlersreichel at gmail.com> wrote: > Let's get an international hangout going. > > > On Tuesday, 29 September 2015, Tomislav Bozic > wrote: > >> Sure, I'll be your proxy ;) >> >> Tom >> >> > Hey Tom et al, >> > >> > I will be in Hong Kong on the day of this meeting. Would anybody else >> > like >> > to volunteer to make a recording? >> > >> > Particularly as I can't make it, I am interested in watching a recording >> > after the event. >> > >> > Also, who would like my proxy vote? >> > >> > CK. >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Tomislav Bozic < >> tomchristmas at progsoc.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Sent on behalf of the Secretary... >> >> >> >> --- >> >> >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> >> >> It's that time of year again, and UTS ProgSoc will be holding elections >> >> and other general business at our Annual General Meeting. >> >> >> >> Date: 14th October 2015 >> >> Time: 6pm >> >> Location: UTS Loft >> >> For executive nominations, please email name + position to >> >> progsoc at progsoc.org . >> >> >> >> AGENDA: >> >> 1. Apologies >> >> 2. Reading of the Minutes >> >> 3. Executive Reports >> >> 4. Constitution Amendments >> >> 5. Elections >> >> 6. General business / unscheduled business >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Nicholas Kobal >> >> ProgSoc Secretary >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Progsoc-announce mailing list >> >> Progsoc-announce at progsoc.org >> >> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc-announce >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- >> To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Progsoc mailing list >> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From knockycode at progsoc.org Thu Oct 1 09:58:02 2015 From: knockycode at progsoc.org (Jenny Nguyen) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:58:02 +1000 Subject: [ProgSoc] Nomination: Jacob Dunk for President In-Reply-To: <8a98c9855e254fc160560dc6384c3a4a.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> References: <8a98c9855e254fc160560dc6384c3a4a.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> Message-ID: I, Jenny Nguyen, second the nomination of Jacob Dunk to the Executive role of President. I've seen him work as an executive for ProgSoc when I was Vice-President and believe that he, along with what Tom has mentioned, has the motivation to lead the club and its members towards their goals. Jenny On 29 September 2015 at 16:38, Tomislav Bozic wrote: > I, Tom Bozic, of sound body and mind, do hereby nominate Jacob Dunk to the > Executive role of President. > > This is what I said when I nominated Jacob six months ago: > > > What can I say? He's got the talent and passion and true leadership > > skills...and I think he would take the club in a direction that is true > to > > the ProgSoc Spirit(TM) which I think is something this club really needs > > right now. > > I don't think I need to change any of that, therefore I repeat what I said > then. > > Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomchristmas at progsoc.org Thu Oct 1 12:43:25 2015 From: tomchristmas at progsoc.org (Tomislav Bozic) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:43:25 +1000 Subject: [ProgSoc] ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October In-Reply-To: References: <3351a3ce39ae1b44eda9811bde4f95ed.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> Message-ID: I'll take your proxy as well. However, I think it would be better if an absent member PUBLICly nominate their proxy closer to the AGM, especially since the proxy will be in a better position to know whether or not they will be able to attend. Tom > I'll be in class from 6pm to 8pm so I wouldn't be able to join a hangout > even if I wanted. > > So can someone have my proxy vote? > > On 29 September 2015 at 21:23, Robin Wohlers-Reichel < > robin.wohlersreichel at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Let's get an international hangout going. >> >> >> On Tuesday, 29 September 2015, Tomislav Bozic >> wrote: >> >>> Sure, I'll be your proxy ;) >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> > Hey Tom et al, >>> > >>> > I will be in Hong Kong on the day of this meeting. Would anybody >>> else >>> > like >>> > to volunteer to make a recording? >>> > >>> > Particularly as I can't make it, I am interested in watching a >>> recording >>> > after the event. >>> > >>> > Also, who would like my proxy vote? >>> > >>> > CK. >>> > >>> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Tomislav Bozic < >>> tomchristmas at progsoc.org> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> Sent on behalf of the Secretary... >>> >> >>> >> --- >>> >> >>> >> Hi everyone, >>> >> >>> >> It's that time of year again, and UTS ProgSoc will be holding >>> elections >>> >> and other general business at our Annual General Meeting. >>> >> >>> >> Date: 14th October 2015 >>> >> Time: 6pm >>> >> Location: UTS Loft >>> >> For executive nominations, please email name + position to >>> >> progsoc at progsoc.org . >>> >> >>> >> AGENDA: >>> >> 1. Apologies >>> >> 2. Reading of the Minutes >>> >> 3. Executive Reports >>> >> 4. Constitution Amendments >>> >> 5. Elections >>> >> 6. General business / unscheduled business >>> >> >>> >> Kind regards, >>> >> Nicholas Kobal >>> >> ProgSoc Secretary >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Progsoc-announce mailing list >>> >> Progsoc-announce at progsoc.org >>> >> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc-announce >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Progsoc mailing list >>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Progsoc mailing list >> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc -- To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... From liamzebedee at gmail.com Sat Oct 3 19:01:03 2015 From: liamzebedee at gmail.com (Liam E-P) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 19:01:03 +1000 Subject: [ProgSoc] Nomination: Jacob Dunk for President Message-ID: I second/third the nomination of Jacob. I've had the pleasure of working with and getting to know him for the past 3 months, he's a very calm friendly guy and his aformentioned hacks (programming language that compiles to Brainfuck [1]) and aspirations for ProgSoc are exemplary of his suitability for presidency. [1] https://github.com/jableader/bfukt Liam Edwards-Playne. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From roland at rolandturner.com Mon Oct 5 22:41:41 2015 From: roland at rolandturner.com (Roland Turner) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:41:41 +0800 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2 "A"GMs? (Re: ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October) In-Reply-To: <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> References: <560A1824.4060000@rolandturner.com> <4AA2EABC-54E9-49A5-8CBC-147898BEF0C2@progsoc.org> <560A1A2F.7060305@rolandturner.com> <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> Message-ID: <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> I meant to ask earlier: much as I admire the enthusiasm evidenced by holding more frequent meetings, an AGM happens - by definition - once a year. For folks who may have missed the detail: why are we having a second one? - Raz On 09/29/2015 03:08 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: > AGM Update > > As the agenda has already been distributed, we will simply state this > during the meeting and record no actions. > > Also please forward all nominations and proxies to > progsocsecretary at gmail.com to > avoid spamming the mailing list. A list of nominations will be > compiled and published as necessary. Toms nominations have been noted, > however any future nomination must be sent directly to the secretary. > > Cheers > Carlin > > >> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:57 pm, Roland Turner > > wrote: >> >> In that case, they should perhaps be removed from the AGM agenda. >> >> (Noting the other part of 8.2 "Notice of motions concerning any such >> amendments shall be lodged with the Secretary at least twenty-one >> (21) days prior to the date of such meeting" meaning that it's too >> late to lodge constitutional amendment motions for a meeting that's >> only 15 days away, consequently no constitutional amendment motions >> can be put at the meeting.) >> >> - Roland >> >> >> >> On 09/29/2015 12:50 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >>> There have been no proposed amendments received. >>> >>> >>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:48 pm, Roland Turner >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'd suggest sharing the text of any proposed constitutional >>>> amendments (item 4) fairly promptly. Note in particular clause 8.2 >>>> : >>>> >>>>> ... at least seven (7) days notice shall be given of such proposed >>>>> amendments to every member ... >>>> >>>> That's explicit: a post on a notice board or a reading at the >>>> meeting is not sufficient by itself. >>>> >>>> - Raz >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09/29/2015 12:43 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >>>>> Sent on behalf of the Secretary... >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> It's that time of year again, and UTS ProgSoc will be holding elections >>>>> and other general business at our Annual General Meeting. >>>>> >>>>> Date: 14th October 2015 >>>>> Time: 6pm >>>>> Location: UTS Loft >>>>> For executive nominations, please email name + position to >>>>> progsoc at progsoc.org . >>>>> >>>>> AGENDA: >>>>> 1. Apologies >>>>> 2. Reading of the Minutes >>>>> 3. Executive Reports >>>>> 4. Constitution Amendments >>>>> 5. Elections >>>>> 6. General business / unscheduled business >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Nicholas Kobal >>>>> ProgSoc Secretary >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Progsoc mailing list >>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomchristmas at progsoc.org Mon Oct 5 22:50:28 2015 From: tomchristmas at progsoc.org (Tomislav Bozic) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 22:50:28 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2 "A"GMs? (Re: ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October) In-Reply-To: <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> References: <560A1824.4060000@rolandturner.com> <4AA2EABC-54E9-49A5-8CBC-147898BEF0C2@progsoc.org> <560A1A2F.7060305@rolandturner.com> <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> Message-ID: Hi Raz, At the first AGM in March, we voted to move AGMs to October to be in line with other clubs at UTS. Hence the second meeting this year. Because of the change, we will only be having two "A"GMs this year. Next year, we will revert to just one actual - "annual" - meeting, although it will take place in October, not March, as in previous years. I know it's not exactly the most precise use of the terminology "annual general meeting", nonetheless, it best describes the activities that will be carried out at that meeting in a succinct manner. Tom P.S. There were *two* AGMs in 1997, BTW -- you were there ;) > I meant to ask earlier: much as I admire the enthusiasm evidenced by > holding more frequent meetings, an AGM happens - by definition - once a > year. For folks who may have missed the detail: why are we having a > second one? > > - Raz > > > > On 09/29/2015 03:08 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >> AGM Update >> >> As the agenda has already been distributed, we will simply state this >> during the meeting and record no actions. >> >> Also please forward all nominations and proxies to >> progsocsecretary at gmail.com to >> avoid spamming the mailing list. A list of nominations will be >> compiled and published as necessary. Toms nominations have been noted, >> however any future nomination must be sent directly to the secretary. >> >> Cheers >> Carlin >> >> >>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:57 pm, Roland Turner >> > wrote: >>> >>> In that case, they should perhaps be removed from the AGM agenda. >>> >>> (Noting the other part of 8.2 "Notice of motions concerning any such >>> amendments shall be lodged with the Secretary at least twenty-one >>> (21) days prior to the date of such meeting" meaning that it's too >>> late to lodge constitutional amendment motions for a meeting that's >>> only 15 days away, consequently no constitutional amendment motions >>> can be put at the meeting.) >>> >>> - Roland >>> >>> >>> >>> On 09/29/2015 12:50 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >>>> There have been no proposed amendments received. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:48 pm, Roland Turner >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'd suggest sharing the text of any proposed constitutional >>>>> amendments (item 4) fairly promptly. Note in particular clause 8.2 >>>>> : >>>>> >>>>>> ... at least seven (7) days notice shall be given of such proposed >>>>>> amendments to every member ... >>>>> >>>>> That's explicit: a post on a notice board or a reading at the >>>>> meeting is not sufficient by itself. >>>>> >>>>> - Raz >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:43 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >>>>>> Sent on behalf of the Secretary... >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> It's that time of year again, and UTS ProgSoc will be holding >>>>>> elections >>>>>> and other general business at our Annual General Meeting. >>>>>> >>>>>> Date: 14th October 2015 >>>>>> Time: 6pm >>>>>> Location: UTS Loft >>>>>> For executive nominations, please email name + position to >>>>>> progsoc at progsoc.org . >>>>>> >>>>>> AGENDA: >>>>>> 1. Apologies >>>>>> 2. Reading of the Minutes >>>>>> 3. Executive Reports >>>>>> 4. Constitution Amendments >>>>>> 5. Elections >>>>>> 6. General business / unscheduled business >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>> Nicholas Kobal >>>>>> ProgSoc Secretary >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Progsoc mailing list >> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc -- To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... From roland at rolandturner.com Mon Oct 5 22:54:05 2015 From: roland at rolandturner.com (Roland Turner) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:54:05 +0800 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2 "A"GMs? (Re: ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October) In-Reply-To: References: <560A1824.4060000@rolandturner.com> <4AA2EABC-54E9-49A5-8CBC-147898BEF0C2@progsoc.org> <560A1A2F.7060305@rolandturner.com> <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> Message-ID: <561264DD.6030804@rolandturner.com> I can certainly see the rationale for operating in line with the Union's norms, but would have thought this would mean simply moving _*next*_ year's AGM (and subsequent ones) to October. Why hold a second one this year? - Raz On 10/05/2015 07:50 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: > Hi Raz, > > At the first AGM in March, we voted to move AGMs to October to be in line > with other clubs at UTS. Hence the second meeting this year. > > Because of the change, we will only be having two "A"GMs this year. Next > year, we will revert to just one actual - "annual" - meeting, although it > will take place in October, not March, as in previous years. > > I know it's not exactly the most precise use of the terminology "annual > general meeting", nonetheless, it best describes the activities that will > be carried out at that meeting in a succinct manner. > > Tom > > P.S. There were *two* AGMs in 1997, BTW -- you were there ;) > >> I meant to ask earlier: much as I admire the enthusiasm evidenced by >> holding more frequent meetings, an AGM happens - by definition - once a >> year. For folks who may have missed the detail: why are we having a >> second one? >> >> - Raz >> >> >> >> On 09/29/2015 03:08 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >>> AGM Update >>> >>> As the agenda has already been distributed, we will simply state this >>> during the meeting and record no actions. >>> >>> Also please forward all nominations and proxies to >>> progsocsecretary at gmail.com to >>> avoid spamming the mailing list. A list of nominations will be >>> compiled and published as necessary. Toms nominations have been noted, >>> however any future nomination must be sent directly to the secretary. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Carlin >>> >>> >>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:57 pm, Roland Turner >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> In that case, they should perhaps be removed from the AGM agenda. >>>> >>>> (Noting the other part of 8.2 "Notice of motions concerning any such >>>> amendments shall be lodged with the Secretary at least twenty-one >>>> (21) days prior to the date of such meeting" meaning that it's too >>>> late to lodge constitutional amendment motions for a meeting that's >>>> only 15 days away, consequently no constitutional amendment motions >>>> can be put at the meeting.) >>>> >>>> - Roland >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09/29/2015 12:50 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >>>>> There have been no proposed amendments received. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:48 pm, Roland Turner >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd suggest sharing the text of any proposed constitutional >>>>>> amendments (item 4) fairly promptly. Note in particular clause 8.2 >>>>>> : >>>>>> >>>>>>> ... at least seven (7) days notice shall be given of such proposed >>>>>>> amendments to every member ... >>>>>> That's explicit: a post on a notice board or a reading at the >>>>>> meeting is not sufficient by itself. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Raz >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:43 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >>>>>>> Sent on behalf of the Secretary... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's that time of year again, and UTS ProgSoc will be holding >>>>>>> elections >>>>>>> and other general business at our Annual General Meeting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Date: 14th October 2015 >>>>>>> Time: 6pm >>>>>>> Location: UTS Loft >>>>>>> For executive nominations, please email name + position to >>>>>>> progsoc at progsoc.org . >>>>>>> >>>>>>> AGENDA: >>>>>>> 1. Apologies >>>>>>> 2. Reading of the Minutes >>>>>>> 3. Executive Reports >>>>>>> 4. Constitution Amendments >>>>>>> 5. Elections >>>>>>> 6. General business / unscheduled business >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>> Nicholas Kobal >>>>>>> ProgSoc Secretary >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Progsoc mailing list >>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> _______________________________________________ >> Progsoc mailing list >> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomchristmas at progsoc.org Mon Oct 5 23:08:03 2015 From: tomchristmas at progsoc.org (Tomislav Bozic) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:08:03 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2 "A"GMs? (Re: ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October) In-Reply-To: <561264DD.6030804@rolandturner.com> References: <560A1824.4060000@rolandturner.com> <4AA2EABC-54E9-49A5-8CBC-147898BEF0C2@progsoc.org> <560A1A2F.7060305@rolandturner.com> <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> <561264DD.6030804@rolandturner.com> Message-ID: <5fa673157d17388f6c1db3a2bdea06e0.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> Section 5.1.3. and 5.1.3.1. of the Constitution[1] should answer your question. Tom --- [1] http://progsoc.org/wiki?title=Constitution&oldid=5420 > I can certainly see the rationale for operating in line with the Union's > norms, but would have thought this would mean simply moving _*next*_ > year's AGM (and subsequent ones) to October. Why hold a second one this > year? > > - Raz > > > > On 10/05/2015 07:50 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >> Hi Raz, >> >> At the first AGM in March, we voted to move AGMs to October to be in >> line >> with other clubs at UTS. Hence the second meeting this year. >> >> Because of the change, we will only be having two "A"GMs this year. Next >> year, we will revert to just one actual - "annual" - meeting, although >> it >> will take place in October, not March, as in previous years. >> >> I know it's not exactly the most precise use of the terminology "annual >> general meeting", nonetheless, it best describes the activities that >> will >> be carried out at that meeting in a succinct manner. >> >> Tom >> >> P.S. There were *two* AGMs in 1997, BTW -- you were there ;) >> >>> I meant to ask earlier: much as I admire the enthusiasm evidenced by >>> holding more frequent meetings, an AGM happens - by definition - once a >>> year. For folks who may have missed the detail: why are we having a >>> second one? >>> >>> - Raz >>> >>> >>> >>> On 09/29/2015 03:08 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >>>> AGM Update >>>> >>>> As the agenda has already been distributed, we will simply state this >>>> during the meeting and record no actions. >>>> >>>> Also please forward all nominations and proxies to >>>> progsocsecretary at gmail.com to >>>> avoid spamming the mailing list. A list of nominations will be >>>> compiled and published as necessary. Toms nominations have been noted, >>>> however any future nomination must be sent directly to the secretary. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Carlin >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:57 pm, Roland Turner >>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> In that case, they should perhaps be removed from the AGM agenda. >>>>> >>>>> (Noting the other part of 8.2 "Notice of motions concerning any such >>>>> amendments shall be lodged with the Secretary at least twenty-one >>>>> (21) days prior to the date of such meeting" meaning that it's too >>>>> late to lodge constitutional amendment motions for a meeting that's >>>>> only 15 days away, consequently no constitutional amendment motions >>>>> can be put at the meeting.) >>>>> >>>>> - Roland >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:50 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >>>>>> There have been no proposed amendments received. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:48 pm, Roland Turner >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd suggest sharing the text of any proposed constitutional >>>>>>> amendments (item 4) fairly promptly. Note in particular clause 8.2 >>>>>>> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... at least seven (7) days notice shall be given of such proposed >>>>>>>> amendments to every member ... >>>>>>> That's explicit: a post on a notice board or a reading at the >>>>>>> meeting is not sufficient by itself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Raz >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:43 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >>>>>>>> Sent on behalf of the Secretary... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's that time of year again, and UTS ProgSoc will be holding >>>>>>>> elections >>>>>>>> and other general business at our Annual General Meeting. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Date: 14th October 2015 >>>>>>>> Time: 6pm >>>>>>>> Location: UTS Loft >>>>>>>> For executive nominations, please email name + position to >>>>>>>> progsoc at progsoc.org . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> AGENDA: >>>>>>>> 1. Apologies >>>>>>>> 2. Reading of the Minutes >>>>>>>> 3. Executive Reports >>>>>>>> 4. Constitution Amendments >>>>>>>> 5. Elections >>>>>>>> 6. General business / unscheduled business >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>> Nicholas Kobal >>>>>>>> ProgSoc Secretary >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Progsoc mailing list >>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc -- To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... From tomchristmas at progsoc.org Mon Oct 5 23:35:51 2015 From: tomchristmas at progsoc.org (Tomislav Bozic) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:35:51 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2 "A"GMs? (Re: ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October) In-Reply-To: References: <560A1824.4060000@rolandturner.com> <4AA2EABC-54E9-49A5-8CBC-147898BEF0C2@progsoc.org> <560A1A2F.7060305@rolandturner.com> <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> <561264DD.6030804@rolandturner.com> <5fa673157d17388f6c1db3a2bdea06e0.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> Message-ID: <1502543793266826f0dbfffb61b099ef.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> Umm, no, because we will only be doing it this year (5.1.3.1. is clear on that point). This was also amended in March by vote of the membership: 7.2.1 The Annual General Meeting shall be held in the month of s/March/October/ each year. Tom > Tom -- risky territory. > > Aside, does it mean we should be changing 8.1 also? > > s/at the Annual General meeting/at any of the Annual General Meetings/ > > j. > > > > > > On 5 October 2015 at 23:08, Tomislav Bozic > wrote: > >> Section 5.1.3. and 5.1.3.1. of the Constitution[1] should answer your >> question. >> >> Tom >> >> --- >> >> [1] http://progsoc.org/wiki?title=Constitution&oldid=5420 >> >> > I can certainly see the rationale for operating in line with the >> Union's >> > norms, but would have thought this would mean simply moving _*next*_ >> > year's AGM (and subsequent ones) to October. Why hold a second one >> this >> > year? >> > >> > - Raz >> > >> > >> > >> > On 10/05/2015 07:50 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >> >> Hi Raz, >> >> >> >> At the first AGM in March, we voted to move AGMs to October to be in >> >> line >> >> with other clubs at UTS. Hence the second meeting this year. >> >> >> >> Because of the change, we will only be having two "A"GMs this year. >> Next >> >> year, we will revert to just one actual - "annual" - meeting, >> although >> >> it >> >> will take place in October, not March, as in previous years. >> >> >> >> I know it's not exactly the most precise use of the terminology >> "annual >> >> general meeting", nonetheless, it best describes the activities that >> >> will >> >> be carried out at that meeting in a succinct manner. >> >> >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> P.S. There were *two* AGMs in 1997, BTW -- you were there ;) >> >> >> >>> I meant to ask earlier: much as I admire the enthusiasm evidenced by >> >>> holding more frequent meetings, an AGM happens - by definition - >> once a >> >>> year. For folks who may have missed the detail: why are we having a >> >>> second one? >> >>> >> >>> - Raz >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 09/29/2015 03:08 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >> >>>> AGM Update >> >>>> >> >>>> As the agenda has already been distributed, we will simply state >> this >> >>>> during the meeting and record no actions. >> >>>> >> >>>> Also please forward all nominations and proxies to >> >>>> progsocsecretary at gmail.com to >> >>>> avoid spamming the mailing list. A list of nominations will be >> >>>> compiled and published as necessary. Toms nominations have been >> noted, >> >>>> however any future nomination must be sent directly to the >> secretary. >> >>>> >> >>>> Cheers >> >>>> Carlin >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:57 pm, Roland Turner > >>>>> > wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> In that case, they should perhaps be removed from the AGM agenda. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> (Noting the other part of 8.2 "Notice of motions concerning any >> such >> >>>>> amendments shall be lodged with the Secretary at least twenty-one >> >>>>> (21) days prior to the date of such meeting" meaning that it's too >> >>>>> late to lodge constitutional amendment motions for a meeting >> that's >> >>>>> only 15 days away, consequently no constitutional amendment >> motions >> >>>>> can be put at the meeting.) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - Roland >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:50 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >> >>>>>> There have been no proposed amendments received. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:48 pm, Roland Turner >> > > >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I'd suggest sharing the text of any proposed constitutional >> >>>>>>> amendments (item 4) fairly promptly. Note in particular clause >> 8.2 >> >>>>>>> < >> http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/wiki/Constitution#8.2_Amendment_Notice>: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> ... at least seven (7) days notice shall be given of such >> proposed >> >>>>>>>> amendments to every member ... >> >>>>>>> That's explicit: a post on a notice board or a reading at the >> >>>>>>> meeting is not sufficient by itself. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> - Raz >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:43 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >> >>>>>>>> Sent on behalf of the Secretary... >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> --- >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> It's that time of year again, and UTS ProgSoc will be holding >> >>>>>>>> elections >> >>>>>>>> and other general business at our Annual General Meeting. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Date: 14th October 2015 >> >>>>>>>> Time: 6pm >> >>>>>>>> Location: UTS Loft >> >>>>>>>> For executive nominations, please email name + position to >> >>>>>>>> progsoc at progsoc.org . >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> AGENDA: >> >>>>>>>> 1. Apologies >> >>>>>>>> 2. Reading of the Minutes >> >>>>>>>> 3. Executive Reports >> >>>>>>>> 4. Constitution Amendments >> >>>>>>>> 5. Elections >> >>>>>>>> 6. General business / unscheduled business >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Kind regards, >> >>>>>>>> Nicholas Kobal >> >>>>>>>> ProgSoc Secretary >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >> >>>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> >>>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >> >>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> >>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >> >>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> >>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Progsoc mailing list >> >>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> >>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Progsoc mailing list >> >>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> >>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Progsoc mailing list >> > Progsoc at progsoc.org >> > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> >> >> -- >> To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Progsoc mailing list >> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> > -- To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... From roland at rolandturner.com Mon Oct 5 23:36:56 2015 From: roland at rolandturner.com (Roland Turner) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:36:56 +0800 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2 "A"GMs? (Re: ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October) In-Reply-To: <5fa673157d17388f6c1db3a2bdea06e0.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> References: <560A1824.4060000@rolandturner.com> <4AA2EABC-54E9-49A5-8CBC-147898BEF0C2@progsoc.org> <560A1A2F.7060305@rolandturner.com> <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> <561264DD.6030804@rolandturner.com> <5fa673157d17388f6c1db3a2bdea06e0.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> Message-ID: <56126EE8.9060903@rolandturner.com> Those clauses merely indicate that the decision to hold two AGMs this year was made and duly recorded, which is fair enough if a little odd; they don't record the rationale, which was my question. Also, I just noticed your postscript: > P.S. There were *two* AGMs in 1997, BTW -- you were there ;) This is misleading. Although two overlapping sets of people met at two different times and in two different places - which in the plain English sense of the word describes two meetings - in the formal sense of an organisation's annual meeting, the two sessions formed a single AGM the second session being an adjournment of the first. The formal items (apologies, reading of minutes, elections, etc.) happened exactly once each, most/all of them at the adjourned session. That is not this year's situation. - Raz On 10/05/2015 08:08 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: > Section 5.1.3. and 5.1.3.1. of the Constitution[1] should answer your > question. > > Tom > > --- > > [1] http://progsoc.org/wiki?title=Constitution&oldid=5420 > >> I can certainly see the rationale for operating in line with the Union's >> norms, but would have thought this would mean simply moving _*next*_ >> year's AGM (and subsequent ones) to October. Why hold a second one this >> year? >> >> - Raz >> >> >> >> On 10/05/2015 07:50 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >>> Hi Raz, >>> >>> At the first AGM in March, we voted to move AGMs to October to be in >>> line >>> with other clubs at UTS. Hence the second meeting this year. >>> >>> Because of the change, we will only be having two "A"GMs this year. Next >>> year, we will revert to just one actual - "annual" - meeting, although >>> it >>> will take place in October, not March, as in previous years. >>> >>> I know it's not exactly the most precise use of the terminology "annual >>> general meeting", nonetheless, it best describes the activities that >>> will >>> be carried out at that meeting in a succinct manner. >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> P.S. There were *two* AGMs in 1997, BTW -- you were there ;) >>> >>>> I meant to ask earlier: much as I admire the enthusiasm evidenced by >>>> holding more frequent meetings, an AGM happens - by definition - once a >>>> year. For folks who may have missed the detail: why are we having a >>>> second one? >>>> >>>> - Raz >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09/29/2015 03:08 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >>>>> AGM Update >>>>> >>>>> As the agenda has already been distributed, we will simply state this >>>>> during the meeting and record no actions. >>>>> >>>>> Also please forward all nominations and proxies to >>>>> progsocsecretary at gmail.com to >>>>> avoid spamming the mailing list. A list of nominations will be >>>>> compiled and published as necessary. Toms nominations have been noted, >>>>> however any future nomination must be sent directly to the secretary. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Carlin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:57 pm, Roland Turner >>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> In that case, they should perhaps be removed from the AGM agenda. >>>>>> >>>>>> (Noting the other part of 8.2 "Notice of motions concerning any such >>>>>> amendments shall be lodged with the Secretary at least twenty-one >>>>>> (21) days prior to the date of such meeting" meaning that it's too >>>>>> late to lodge constitutional amendment motions for a meeting that's >>>>>> only 15 days away, consequently no constitutional amendment motions >>>>>> can be put at the meeting.) >>>>>> >>>>>> - Roland >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:50 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >>>>>>> There have been no proposed amendments received. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:48 pm, Roland Turner >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd suggest sharing the text of any proposed constitutional >>>>>>>> amendments (item 4) fairly promptly. Note in particular clause 8.2 >>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ... at least seven (7) days notice shall be given of such proposed >>>>>>>>> amendments to every member ... >>>>>>>> That's explicit: a post on a notice board or a reading at the >>>>>>>> meeting is not sufficient by itself. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Raz >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:43 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >>>>>>>>> Sent on behalf of the Secretary... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's that time of year again, and UTS ProgSoc will be holding >>>>>>>>> elections >>>>>>>>> and other general business at our Annual General Meeting. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Date: 14th October 2015 >>>>>>>>> Time: 6pm >>>>>>>>> Location: UTS Loft >>>>>>>>> For executive nominations, please email name + position to >>>>>>>>> progsoc at progsoc.org . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> AGENDA: >>>>>>>>> 1. Apologies >>>>>>>>> 2. Reading of the Minutes >>>>>>>>> 3. Executive Reports >>>>>>>>> 4. Constitution Amendments >>>>>>>>> 5. Elections >>>>>>>>> 6. General business / unscheduled business >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>>> Nicholas Kobal >>>>>>>>> ProgSoc Secretary >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> _______________________________________________ >> Progsoc mailing list >> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > From tomchristmas at progsoc.org Mon Oct 5 23:52:16 2015 From: tomchristmas at progsoc.org (Tomislav Bozic) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:52:16 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2 "A"GMs? (Re: ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October) In-Reply-To: <56126EE8.9060903@rolandturner.com> References: <560A1824.4060000@rolandturner.com> <4AA2EABC-54E9-49A5-8CBC-147898BEF0C2@progsoc.org> <560A1A2F.7060305@rolandturner.com> <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> <561264DD.6030804@rolandturner.com> <5fa673157d17388f6c1db3a2bdea06e0.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> <56126EE8.9060903@rolandturner.com> Message-ID: > they don't record the rationale, which was my question. Then, "to be in line with other clubs' AGM schedules at UTS", should be closer to the answer you seek. There's not much more I can say beyond that. >> P.S. There were *two* AGMs in 1997, BTW -- you were there ;) > > This is misleading. I know. My remark was a gross oversimplification of an extraordinary event :P Tom > Those clauses merely indicate that the decision to hold two AGMs this > year was made and duly recorded, which is fair enough if a little odd; > they don't record the rationale, which was my question. > > Also, I just noticed your postscript: > >> P.S. There were *two* AGMs in 1997, BTW -- you were there ;) > > This is misleading. Although two overlapping sets of people met at two > different times and in two different places - which in the plain English > sense of the word describes two meetings - in the formal sense of an > organisation's annual meeting, the two sessions formed a single AGM the > second session being an adjournment of the first. The formal items > (apologies, reading of minutes, elections, etc.) happened exactly once > each, most/all of them at the adjourned session. That is not this year's > situation. > > > - Raz > > > > On 10/05/2015 08:08 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >> Section 5.1.3. and 5.1.3.1. of the Constitution[1] should answer your >> question. >> >> Tom >> >> --- >> >> [1] http://progsoc.org/wiki?title=Constitution&oldid=5420 >> >>> I can certainly see the rationale for operating in line with the >>> Union's >>> norms, but would have thought this would mean simply moving _*next*_ >>> year's AGM (and subsequent ones) to October. Why hold a second one this >>> year? >>> >>> - Raz >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/05/2015 07:50 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >>>> Hi Raz, >>>> >>>> At the first AGM in March, we voted to move AGMs to October to be in >>>> line >>>> with other clubs at UTS. Hence the second meeting this year. >>>> >>>> Because of the change, we will only be having two "A"GMs this year. >>>> Next >>>> year, we will revert to just one actual - "annual" - meeting, although >>>> it >>>> will take place in October, not March, as in previous years. >>>> >>>> I know it's not exactly the most precise use of the terminology >>>> "annual >>>> general meeting", nonetheless, it best describes the activities that >>>> will >>>> be carried out at that meeting in a succinct manner. >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> P.S. There were *two* AGMs in 1997, BTW -- you were there ;) >>>> >>>>> I meant to ask earlier: much as I admire the enthusiasm evidenced by >>>>> holding more frequent meetings, an AGM happens - by definition - once >>>>> a >>>>> year. For folks who may have missed the detail: why are we having a >>>>> second one? >>>>> >>>>> - Raz >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/29/2015 03:08 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >>>>>> AGM Update >>>>>> >>>>>> As the agenda has already been distributed, we will simply state >>>>>> this >>>>>> during the meeting and record no actions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also please forward all nominations and proxies to >>>>>> progsocsecretary at gmail.com to >>>>>> avoid spamming the mailing list. A list of nominations will be >>>>>> compiled and published as necessary. Toms nominations have been >>>>>> noted, >>>>>> however any future nomination must be sent directly to the >>>>>> secretary. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> Carlin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:57 pm, Roland Turner >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In that case, they should perhaps be removed from the AGM agenda. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (Noting the other part of 8.2 "Notice of motions concerning any >>>>>>> such >>>>>>> amendments shall be lodged with the Secretary at least twenty-one >>>>>>> (21) days prior to the date of such meeting" meaning that it's too >>>>>>> late to lodge constitutional amendment motions for a meeting that's >>>>>>> only 15 days away, consequently no constitutional amendment motions >>>>>>> can be put at the meeting.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Roland >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:50 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: >>>>>>>> There have been no proposed amendments received. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:48 pm, Roland Turner >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd suggest sharing the text of any proposed constitutional >>>>>>>>> amendments (item 4) fairly promptly. Note in particular clause >>>>>>>>> 8.2 >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ... at least seven (7) days notice shall be given of such >>>>>>>>>> proposed >>>>>>>>>> amendments to every member ... >>>>>>>>> That's explicit: a post on a notice board or a reading at the >>>>>>>>> meeting is not sufficient by itself. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Raz >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:43 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Sent on behalf of the Secretary... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's that time of year again, and UTS ProgSoc will be holding >>>>>>>>>> elections >>>>>>>>>> and other general business at our Annual General Meeting. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Date: 14th October 2015 >>>>>>>>>> Time: 6pm >>>>>>>>>> Location: UTS Loft >>>>>>>>>> For executive nominations, please email name + position to >>>>>>>>>> progsoc at progsoc.org . >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> AGENDA: >>>>>>>>>> 1. Apologies >>>>>>>>>> 2. Reading of the Minutes >>>>>>>>>> 3. Executive Reports >>>>>>>>>> 4. Constitution Amendments >>>>>>>>>> 5. Elections >>>>>>>>>> 6. General business / unscheduled business >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>>>> Nicholas Kobal >>>>>>>>>> ProgSoc Secretary >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Progsoc mailing list >>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Progsoc mailing list >>> Progsoc at progsoc.org >>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > > -- To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... From tomchristmas at progsoc.org Tue Oct 6 13:34:31 2015 From: tomchristmas at progsoc.org (Tomislav Bozic) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:34:31 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2015 AGM Proxy declaration In-Reply-To: <20151006022616.GA1333@niflheim.progsoc.uts.edu.au> References: <20151006022616.GA1333@niflheim.progsoc.uts.edu.au> Message-ID: <57e665521019f0776be7b01a3ad51b65.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> I, Tom Bozic, accept Andrew Halliday's request for proxy. > I, Andrew Halliday, user arh at progsoc.org, give Tom Bozic, user > tomchristmas at progsoc.org my proxy vote for the AGM on 14th October 2015. > Tom, could you please reply to all to indicate whether you accept this > request for you to be my proxy? > > Kind regards, > Andi > > arh at progsoc.org > mail at andi.id.au > > > > -- To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... From liamzebedee at gmail.com Thu Oct 8 09:31:40 2015 From: liamzebedee at gmail.com (Liam E-P) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:31:40 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] Acceptance of nomination Message-ID: I, Liam Zebedee Edwards-Playne, late of Brisbane but not of spirit, do humbly accept the nomination of Vice-President. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From curious.jp at gmail.com Thu Oct 8 11:37:32 2015 From: curious.jp at gmail.com (Bryn Davies) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:37:32 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2 "A"GMs? (Re: ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October) In-Reply-To: References: <560A1824.4060000@rolandturner.com> <4AA2EABC-54E9-49A5-8CBC-147898BEF0C2@progsoc.org> <560A1A2F.7060305@rolandturner.com> <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> Message-ID: On 5 October 2015 at 22:50, Tomislav Bozic wrote: > At the first AGM in March, we voted to move AGMs to October to be in line > with other clubs at UTS. Hence the second meeting this year. > Aside - very reminiscent of the abolition of January and February 1751 in England and the dominions (see Calendar (New Style) Act 1750 24 Geo. 2 c. 23) . -- "And let us consider again, that all the law is not in the hand of Giant Despair: others, so far as I can understand, have been taken by him as well as we, and yet have escaped out of his hands." -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomchristmas at progsoc.org Thu Oct 8 14:01:26 2015 From: tomchristmas at progsoc.org (Tomislav Bozic) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:01:26 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2 "A"GMs? (Re: ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October) In-Reply-To: References: <560A1824.4060000@rolandturner.com> <4AA2EABC-54E9-49A5-8CBC-147898BEF0C2@progsoc.org> <560A1A2F.7060305@rolandturner.com> <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> Message-ID: <41cd6a84d6811e635159d4d6090f8ccf.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> Aside to that aside - the Epoch for dates in SQL Server is: 1753-01-01 00:00:00.000 Tom > On 5 October 2015 at 22:50, Tomislav Bozic > wrote: > >> At the first AGM in March, we voted to move AGMs to October to be in >> line >> with other clubs at UTS. Hence the second meeting this year. >> > > Aside - very reminiscent of the abolition of January and February 1751 in > England and the dominions (see Calendar (New Style) Act 1750 24 Geo. 2 c. > 23) . > > -- > "And let us consider again, that all the law is not in the hand of Giant > Despair: others, so far as I can understand, have been taken by him as > well > as we, and yet have escaped out of his hands." > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc -- To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... From roland at rolandturner.com Mon Oct 12 14:42:51 2015 From: roland at rolandturner.com (Roland Turner) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:42:51 +0800 Subject: [ProgSoc] Should Australian Technology Park be saved by the NSW and Federal governments? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <561B2C3B.1020304@rolandturner.com> (clearing old email) Singapore's success with Block 71 (now JTC LaunchPad) suggests that government efforts to foster a startup sector by encouraging concentration - and doing so in an environment where land costs are even higher than Sydney's - can support material progress in this direction. I suspect that a real estate deal by itself is nowhere near enough though: many parts of Singapore's government have been working with the startup ecosystem, both independently and in coordinated ways, for years to get to the current state. It does not seem likely that state or federal governments in Australia would be capable of this, even if they wanted to. - Raz On 09/23/2015 05:21 AM, Leefe wrote: > The Australian Technology Park is currently being sold off to the highest bidder. > Should it be saved as a technology and innovation hub? > > Some big names in the Sydney technology sector think so. > Have a read of the article and sign the petition if you agree. > > Why the Australian Technology Park in Sydney is a national issue (BRW, 18 September 2015) > http://www.brw.com.au/p/business/why_the_australian_technology_park_b8UG4HSqnKGogKXNF03oIN > > Sign the petition: Save Australian Technology Park as a technology hub > https://www.change.org/p/robert-stokes-nsw-planning-minister-save-australian-technology-park-as-a-technology-hub > > > Leefe > http://www.progsoc.org/~3trk/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc From roland at rolandturner.com Mon Oct 12 15:03:17 2015 From: roland at rolandturner.com (Roland Turner) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:03:17 +0800 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2015 AGM proxy appointment Message-ID: <561B3105.9010301@rolandturner.com> Dear secretary[1], I hereby appoint Tom Bozic to be my proxy for this week's ProgSoc AGM. This is an undirected proxy appointment, my proxy may vote on any motion put to the meeting - or any continuation of it - as he sees fit. - Roland 1: Why is the secretary's apparent email address not a @progsoc.org one? From knockycode at progsoc.org Mon Oct 12 15:41:18 2015 From: knockycode at progsoc.org (Jenny Nguyen) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:41:18 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2015 AGM proxy appointment by Jenny N Message-ID: I appoint Tom Bozic to be my proxy for the 2015 Oct ProgSoc AGM as I have class with mandatory attendance running at the same time. It is an undirected proxy appointment. Jenny Nguyen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From progsocsecretary at gmail.com Mon Oct 12 16:12:50 2015 From: progsocsecretary at gmail.com (Secretary ProgSoc) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:12:50 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] AGM 2015 Nominations Message-ID: Hi All, Here is a list of the current nominees for the upcoming AGM on the 14/10/15: PositionNominationNominated BySecondedCSOLewys MartinRobin Wohlers-Reichel PresidentLiam ZebedeeCarlin Rookes PresidentJacob DunkRobin Wohlers-ReichelJenny NguyenSecretaryNicholas KobalRobin Wohlers-ReichelCarlin RookesTreasurerMai NguyenCarlin Rookes Vice-PresidentLiam ZebedeeTom BozicJacob Dunk Kind Regards, Nick Kobal ProgSoc Secretary -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomchristmas at progsoc.org Mon Oct 12 17:18:35 2015 From: tomchristmas at progsoc.org (Tomislav Bozic) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:18:35 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] AGM 2015 Nominations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I, Tom Bozic, second the following people for their respective Executive roles: * Liam Zebedee (Edwards-Playne) for President. I would be happy if either Liam or Jacob were President. * Lewys Martin for CSO, since he is Robin Wohlers-Reichel's PFY, and hence the "designated successor". Tom > Hi All, > > Here is a list of the current nominees for the upcoming AGM on the > 14/10/15: > > PositionNominationNominated BySecondedCSOLewys MartinRobin Wohlers-Reichel > PresidentLiam ZebedeeCarlin Rookes > PresidentJacob DunkRobin Wohlers-ReichelJenny NguyenSecretaryNicholas > KobalRobin > Wohlers-ReichelCarlin RookesTreasurerMai NguyenCarlin Rookes > Vice-PresidentLiam ZebedeeTom BozicJacob Dunk > Kind Regards, > Nick Kobal > ProgSoc Secretary > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc -- To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... From jacobdunk at gmail.com Mon Oct 12 17:52:00 2015 From: jacobdunk at gmail.com (Jacob D) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:52:00 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] Nomination: Jacob Dunk for President In-Reply-To: References: <8a98c9855e254fc160560dc6384c3a4a.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> Message-ID: I, Jacob Dunk, accept my nomination for the role of president. If elected I intend to go far beyond meeting all of our goals and expectations, and push the society towards a more open, active, friendly and fun environment for our members. Cheers, Jacob On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Jenny Nguyen wrote: > I, Jenny Nguyen, second the nomination of Jacob Dunk to the Executive role > of President. > > I've seen him work as an executive for ProgSoc when I was Vice-President > and believe that he, along with what Tom has mentioned, has the motivation > to lead the club and its members towards their goals. > > Jenny > > On 29 September 2015 at 16:38, Tomislav Bozic > wrote: > >> I, Tom Bozic, of sound body and mind, do hereby nominate Jacob Dunk to the >> Executive role of President. >> >> This is what I said when I nominated Jacob six months ago: >> >> > What can I say? He's got the talent and passion and true leadership >> > skills...and I think he would take the club in a direction that is true >> to >> > the ProgSoc Spirit(TM) which I think is something this club really needs >> > right now. >> >> I don't think I need to change any of that, therefore I repeat what I said >> then. >> >> Tom >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Progsoc mailing list >> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chris at deigan.id.au Mon Oct 12 18:06:09 2015 From: chris at deigan.id.au (Chris Deigan) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:06:09 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] Proxy for AGM Message-ID: Who is attending the AGM and would be able to proxy for me? I have another event to attend that evening, so in the event I make it to the AGM, it will probably be mid-way or after voting. -Chris. From tomchristmas at progsoc.org Mon Oct 12 18:55:38 2015 From: tomchristmas at progsoc.org (Tomislav Bozic) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:55:38 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] Proxy for AGM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm going, but I already have four proxies, so can someone else take Chris' proxy? Tom > Who is attending the AGM and would be able to proxy for me? > > I have another event to attend that evening, so in the event I make it > to the AGM, it will probably be mid-way or after voting. > > -Chris. > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > > -- To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... From tomchristmas at progsoc.org Mon Oct 12 21:12:52 2015 From: tomchristmas at progsoc.org (Tomislav Bozic) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:12:52 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] Proxy for AGM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The important thing is I got your email ;) I would prefer it if people just explicitly nominate their proxy (as Raz and Andi have) rather than put it out on the open market... Tom > Presumably you'd want a proxy who thought like you though? : ) > > Anyway, I'm pending confirmation on my membership status for this year. > > And indeed whether this email will get through (got a bounce on the last > one, to-list, a month ago). > > j. > > > On 12 October 2015 at 18:55, Tomislav Bozic > wrote: > >> I'm going, but I already have four proxies, so can someone else take >> Chris' proxy? >> >> Tom >> >> > Who is attending the AGM and would be able to proxy for me? >> > >> > I have another event to attend that evening, so in the event I make it >> > to the AGM, it will probably be mid-way or after voting. >> > >> > -Chris. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Progsoc mailing list >> > Progsoc at progsoc.org >> > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Progsoc mailing list >> Progsoc at progsoc.org >> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc >> > -- To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... From liamzebedee at gmail.com Tue Oct 13 14:57:10 2015 From: liamzebedee at gmail.com (Liam E-P) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:57:10 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] Acceptance of nomination Message-ID: I kindly accept the nomination for president. On the note of the AGM, will there be drinks? Liam. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From liamzebedee at gmail.com Sat Oct 31 12:36:45 2015 From: liamzebedee at gmail.com (Liam E-P) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:36:45 +1100 Subject: [ProgSoc] Programming ethics in Autonomous Vehicles Message-ID: Jacob linked this to me the other day, thought might post here. It's an article posing an interesting problem for the future - how do we program ethics into self-driving cars and the like? And which ethical disposition (utilitarian, etc.)? http://www.iflscience.com/technology/should-self-driving-car-be-programmed-kill-its-passengers-greater-good-scenario Would be interesting when they embed this in law. Liam. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From roland at rolandturner.com Sat Oct 31 16:22:47 2015 From: roland at rolandturner.com (Roland Turner) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:22:47 +0800 Subject: [ProgSoc] Programming ethics in Autonomous Vehicles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <56345027.607@rolandturner.com> On 10/31/2015 09:36 AM, Liam E-P wrote: > Jacob linked this to me the other day, thought might post here. It's > an article posing an interesting problem for the future - how do we > program ethics into self-driving cars and the like? And which ethical > disposition (utilitarian, etc.)? > > http://www.iflscience.com/technology/should-self-driving-car-be-programmed-kill-its-passengers-greater-good-scenario > > Would be interesting when they embed this in law. I'd suggest that this is less future/hypothetical than ethics professors like to pretend: * collision-avoidant vehicles have been on the road (in real use, not merely R&D prototypes) for almost 30 years, * those which recognise and deal separately with soft obstacles (humans or animals) for almost 10, * those which recognise and deal separately with human beings specifically for at least 2 years. The real-world priority is simple, as for a car driven by a human: protect the vehicle's occupants first, avoid collision wherever possible second. - Roland -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jedd.rashbrooke at gmail.com Mon Oct 5 23:23:01 2015 From: jedd.rashbrooke at gmail.com (Jedd Rashbrooke) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:23:01 -0000 Subject: [ProgSoc] 2 "A"GMs? (Re: ProgSoc AGM 2015 -- 14th October) In-Reply-To: <5fa673157d17388f6c1db3a2bdea06e0.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> References: <560A1824.4060000@rolandturner.com> <4AA2EABC-54E9-49A5-8CBC-147898BEF0C2@progsoc.org> <560A1A2F.7060305@rolandturner.com> <1ABACF04-6540-4F61-A290-5600281599FF@progsoc.org> <561261F5.7050204@rolandturner.com> <561264DD.6030804@rolandturner.com> <5fa673157d17388f6c1db3a2bdea06e0.squirrel@webmail.progsoc.org> Message-ID: Tom -- risky territory. Aside, does it mean we should be changing 8.1 also? s/at the Annual General meeting/at any of the Annual General Meetings/ j. On 5 October 2015 at 23:08, Tomislav Bozic wrote: > Section 5.1.3. and 5.1.3.1. of the Constitution[1] should answer your > question. > > Tom > > --- > > [1] http://progsoc.org/wiki?title=Constitution&oldid=5420 > > > I can certainly see the rationale for operating in line with the Union's > > norms, but would have thought this would mean simply moving _*next*_ > > year's AGM (and subsequent ones) to October. Why hold a second one this > > year? > > > > - Raz > > > > > > > > On 10/05/2015 07:50 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: > >> Hi Raz, > >> > >> At the first AGM in March, we voted to move AGMs to October to be in > >> line > >> with other clubs at UTS. Hence the second meeting this year. > >> > >> Because of the change, we will only be having two "A"GMs this year. Next > >> year, we will revert to just one actual - "annual" - meeting, although > >> it > >> will take place in October, not March, as in previous years. > >> > >> I know it's not exactly the most precise use of the terminology "annual > >> general meeting", nonetheless, it best describes the activities that > >> will > >> be carried out at that meeting in a succinct manner. > >> > >> Tom > >> > >> P.S. There were *two* AGMs in 1997, BTW -- you were there ;) > >> > >>> I meant to ask earlier: much as I admire the enthusiasm evidenced by > >>> holding more frequent meetings, an AGM happens - by definition - once a > >>> year. For folks who may have missed the detail: why are we having a > >>> second one? > >>> > >>> - Raz > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 09/29/2015 03:08 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: > >>>> AGM Update > >>>> > >>>> As the agenda has already been distributed, we will simply state this > >>>> during the meeting and record no actions. > >>>> > >>>> Also please forward all nominations and proxies to > >>>> progsocsecretary at gmail.com to > >>>> avoid spamming the mailing list. A list of nominations will be > >>>> compiled and published as necessary. Toms nominations have been noted, > >>>> however any future nomination must be sent directly to the secretary. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers > >>>> Carlin > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:57 pm, Roland Turner >>>>> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> In that case, they should perhaps be removed from the AGM agenda. > >>>>> > >>>>> (Noting the other part of 8.2 "Notice of motions concerning any such > >>>>> amendments shall be lodged with the Secretary at least twenty-one > >>>>> (21) days prior to the date of such meeting" meaning that it's too > >>>>> late to lodge constitutional amendment motions for a meeting that's > >>>>> only 15 days away, consequently no constitutional amendment motions > >>>>> can be put at the meeting.) > >>>>> > >>>>> - Roland > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:50 PM, Carlin Rookes wrote: > >>>>>> There have been no proposed amendments received. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:48 pm, Roland Turner > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'd suggest sharing the text of any proposed constitutional > >>>>>>> amendments (item 4) fairly promptly. Note in particular clause 8.2 > >>>>>>> < > http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/wiki/Constitution#8.2_Amendment_Notice>: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ... at least seven (7) days notice shall be given of such proposed > >>>>>>>> amendments to every member ... > >>>>>>> That's explicit: a post on a notice board or a reading at the > >>>>>>> meeting is not sufficient by itself. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - Raz > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 09/29/2015 12:43 PM, Tomislav Bozic wrote: > >>>>>>>> Sent on behalf of the Secretary... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It's that time of year again, and UTS ProgSoc will be holding > >>>>>>>> elections > >>>>>>>> and other general business at our Annual General Meeting. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Date: 14th October 2015 > >>>>>>>> Time: 6pm > >>>>>>>> Location: UTS Loft > >>>>>>>> For executive nominations, please email name + position to > >>>>>>>> progsoc at progsoc.org . > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> AGENDA: > >>>>>>>> 1. Apologies > >>>>>>>> 2. Reading of the Minutes > >>>>>>>> 3. Executive Reports > >>>>>>>> 4. Constitution Amendments > >>>>>>>> 5. Elections > >>>>>>>> 6. General business / unscheduled business > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Kind regards, > >>>>>>>> Nicholas Kobal > >>>>>>>> ProgSoc Secretary > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list > >>>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org > >>>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> Progsoc mailing list > >>>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org > >>>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Progsoc mailing list > >>>>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org > >>>>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Progsoc mailing list > >>>> Progsoc at progsoc.org > >>>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Progsoc mailing list > >>> Progsoc at progsoc.org > >>> http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Progsoc mailing list > > Progsoc at progsoc.org > > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > > > -- > To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... > > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jedd.rashbrooke at gmail.com Mon Oct 12 20:46:14 2015 From: jedd.rashbrooke at gmail.com (Jedd Rashbrooke) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:46:14 -0000 Subject: [ProgSoc] Proxy for AGM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Presumably you'd want a proxy who thought like you though? : ) Anyway, I'm pending confirmation on my membership status for this year. And indeed whether this email will get through (got a bounce on the last one, to-list, a month ago). j. On 12 October 2015 at 18:55, Tomislav Bozic wrote: > I'm going, but I already have four proxies, so can someone else take > Chris' proxy? > > Tom > > > Who is attending the AGM and would be able to proxy for me? > > > > I have another event to attend that evening, so in the event I make it > > to the AGM, it will probably be mid-way or after voting. > > > > -Chris. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Progsoc mailing list > > Progsoc at progsoc.org > > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > > > > > > > -- > To judiciously use split infinitives is fine by me... > > > _______________________________________________ > Progsoc mailing list > Progsoc at progsoc.org > http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: