>
> Do you think you could give the person the benefit of the doubt
> ("innocent until proven guilty") by taking it up as a private matter
> (someone in a real position of authority) before broadcasting to the
> list.
>
I shouldn't think so, as this is at least the second person
found to be doing this stuff on ftoomsh. (And the evidence is
rather conclusive, don't you think?)
________________________________________________________________
piers@nospam.socs.uts.edu.au kaleid@nospam.ftoomsh.socs.uts.edu.au
"We could all be wrong." - Laurie Anderson