[ProgSoc] So much for censorship
Noah O'Donoghue
noah.odonoghue at students.mq.edu.au
Fri Mar 20 12:48:17 EST 2009
My guess is nothing.
1. They'd need to have you under some form of legal surveillance to start
with. (eg, get a warrant)
2. Most of the sites on that list likely resolve to parked domains anyway..
if the content was illegal then it's likely been taken down.
-----Original Message-----
From: progsoc-bounces at progsoc.org [mailto:progsoc-bounces at progsoc.org] On
Behalf Of James Kirsop
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 12:15 PM
To: progsoc at progsoc.org
Subject: Re: [ProgSoc] So much for censorship
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:32:55PM +1100, sanguinev at progsoc.org wrote:
> http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/19/1237054961100.html
>
> Wikileaks has the ACMA blacklist now (I won't link directly to save
> ProgSoc the $11,000/day fine). It seems that the list is not limited
> only to apparent child pornography sites, wikileaks is on the list now.
>
I'm interested to know what happens to someone who visits a site on the
blacklist. (Obviously,
I'm not going to do this my self) It seems a little silly to have a list of
bad sites, when
people can easily get to it through Google (as someone has pointed out).
James
_______________________________________________
Progsoc mailing list
Progsoc at progsoc.org
http://progsoc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/progsoc
More information about the Progsoc
mailing list