[ProgSoc] Corporate sponsorship
wzdd at progsoc.org
Fri Aug 12 05:31:04 EST 2011
On 02/08/2011, at 8:23 AM, John Elliot wrote:
> On 2/08/2011 12:34 PM, Justin Steward wrote:
>> Brevity =/= lukewarm, merely pushed for time.
> OK, so you and ctd are conditionally "for" sponsorship, but we haven't heard anything from anyone else.
Just for the record (I'm not going to fight to the death for either position):
1) ProgSoc generally doesn't need a lot of money; and
2) Nobody has come up with a popular suggestion for how a huge amount more money could be spent; and
3) It seems like it could only be bad to be financially beholden to somebody with interests which don't necessarily completely align with ours, especially since we (per point 1) don't actually have to be, so
4) I'm not in favour of corporate sponsorship for ProgSoc.
More information about the Progsoc